Papers with knowledge editing approaches
EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models (2024.acl-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuansheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, Huajun Chen
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from knowledge cutoff or fallacy issues, which means they are unaware of unseen events or generate text with incorrect facts owing to outdated/noisy data. |
| Approach: | They propose an easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for Large Language Models that allows users to easily edit updated knowledge and adjust undesired behavior while minimizing the impact on unrelated inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses traditional fine-tuning in terms of reliability and generalization. |
Model Merging for Knowledge Editing (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Zichuan Fu, Xian Wu, Guojing Li, Yingying Zhang, Yefeng Zheng, Tianshi Ming, Yejing Wang, Wanyu Wang, Xiangyu Zhao
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing approaches struggle with sequential editing scenarios and harm the general capabilities of the model. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines robust supervised fine-tuning and model merging for knowledge editing to combine supervised and supervised learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing methods in sequential editing while preserving the original performance of the model. |
Detoxifying Large Language Models via Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mengru Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Ziwen Xu, Zekun Xi, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Qishen Zhang, Linyi Yang, Jindong Wang, Huajun Chen
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detoxify Large Language Models (LLMs) are limiting, but knowledge editing can be effective. |
| Approach: | They propose a baseline method to detoxify Large Language Models (LLMs) they propose supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces toxicity of large language models with one instance of tuning . it reduces the toxicity, while minimizing the toxins, the authors show . |
Propagation and Pitfalls: Reasoning-based Assessment of Knowledge Editing through Counterfactual Tasks (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods struggle to effectively propagate updates to interconnected facts, limiting the performance of reasoning tasks based on these updated facts. |
| Approach: | They propose a reasoning-based benchmark, ReCoE, which covers six common reasoning schemes in the real world. |
| Outcome: | The proposed reasoning-based benchmark shows that current models struggle to propagate updated knowledge within reasoning schemes. |
Decoupling Reasoning and Knowledge Injection for In-Context Knowledge Editing (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing approaches directly edit model context without isolating target knowledge from the reasoning path of model inference, resulting in unreliable and low-quality outputs, especially in multi-hop tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that separates model reasoning from knowledge editing and propose 'DecKER' that allows users to modify specific factual associations without retraining the entire model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves multi-hop reasoning performance by mitigating knowledge conflicts and preserving reasoning integrity. |